Secondary context

The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus

Secondary Christian apologetics source for historical resurrection arguments.

Citation

Gary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, Kregel Publications, 2004.

Used as secondary context for the minimal facts case for the resurrection.

Buddhism
Religion: A careful worldview profile for answering Buddhist questions about suffering, no-self, karma, rebirth, creation, and Jesus.
Liar, Lunatic, or Lord
Argument: A careful use of C. S. Lewis's trilemma against the claim that Jesus was merely a good moral teacher.
Resurrection as Messianic Vindication
Argument: A biblical argument that Jesus' resurrection vindicates him as Messiah and Lord.
The Bodily Resurrection of Jesus
Argument: A biblical argument that Jesus rose bodily, not as a recreated spirit or a symbolic memory.
The Resurrection Witnesses
Argument: A biblical and historical argument that the public witness to Jesus' resurrection belongs at the center of Christian apologetics.
Jesus Rose as a Spirit Creature
Objection: A response to the Watch Tower claim that Jesus did not rise bodily.
Miracles Are Impossible
Objection: A concise answer to the objection that miracles cannot happen because they would violate natural law.
The Cross and Resurrection
Topic: Issue map for Jesus' crucifixion, burial, resurrection, witnesses, and alternative explanations.